Advertisement

Comparative study of different histologic classifications in the degree of differentiation in endometrial adenocarcinoma

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the concordance among the available histologic classifications for endometrial adenocarcinoma using interobserver and intraobserver agreement as well as the association of tumor histologic degree in the above mentioned classifications with cellular proliferation measured by Ki-67.

Methods

Seventy women who underwent surgical treatment of endometrial adenocarcinoma with histologic confirmation of endometrioid type were included in the study. Two experienced pathologists randomly analyzed the slides in 3 distinct timeframes with a maximum of 25 slides/timeframe. Tumor slides were classified according to the degree of differentiation using 4 different classifications: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), modified FIGO, Lax, and Alkushi.

Results

Intraobserver agreement was reasonable for classification of FIGO (k 0.469 and 0.538), very good for modified FIGO (k 0.661 and 0.768), moderate for Lax classification (k 0.496 and 0.466), and moderate/good for Alkushi classification (k 0.528 and 0.736). Interobserver concordance was regular for FIGO classification (k = 0.271 and 0.343), good/moderate for modified FIGO classification (k = 0.661 and 0.522, respectively), regular/moderate for Lax classification (k = 0.258 and 0.465, respectively), and regular for Alkushi classification (k = 0.283 and 0.402).

Conclusions

The prognostic value of histologic grading in endometrial carcinoma and its importance for a successful therapeutic plan have been documented repeatedly, but the best grading system, in terms of prognostication, reproducibility, ease of use, and universality (e.g., applicability to all tumor cell types), has not been unequivocally defined.

Tumori 2016; 102(5): 488 - 495

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/tj.5000528

Authors

Agnaldo L. Silva-Filho, Érica B.S. Xavier, Eduardo B. Cândido, Ricardo Macarenco, Márcia C.F. Ferreira, Marcelo A.P. Xavier, Rayra A.M. Maciel, Paula V.T. Vidigal

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: No financial support was received for this submission.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has conflict of interest with this submission.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG - Brazil
  • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Mastology, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
  • Clinical Hospital of Medical School of Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG - Brazil
  • Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
  • Department of Pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG - Brazil
  • Academic of Medical School of Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG - Brazil

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.