Advertisement

Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study

Abstract

Purpose

Several studies have demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) rectal cancer surgeries and have shown how challenging LS may become. Robotic surgery (RS) has emerged as a practical alternative, offering interesting advantages in comparison to both LS and OS. The aim of this study is to resolve the clinicopathologic outcome advantages of RS with respect to OS and LS techniques.

Methods

Patients with rectal cancer undergoing OS, RS, or LS were evaluated within the period from April 2009 to August 2011. The evaluations were carried out in 4 Italian hospitals. Perioperative clinicopathologic data, postoperative complications, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed.

Results

A total of 160 patients (94 male, 66 female) were included. A total of 105 patients underwent mini-invasive procedure (40 LS; 65 RS), whereas OS was performed in 55 patients. Anterior resection of rectal cancer was the most performed surgical procedure (139; 87%). Median operation time was significantly longer in the RS group (p<0.01). Regarding complication rates and quality of the surgical specimen evaluation, no statistical difference was found among the 3 groups. The shortest hospital stay (p<0.01) was obtained from the LS and RS groups. The median follow-up was 33 months without any significant difference in overall and DFS rates.

Conclusions

Although RS for rectal cancer requires more time to be performed than LS and OS techniques, the analysis shows comparatively the feasibility and safety of RS in terms of perioperative clinicopathologic and medium-term outcomes.

Tumori 2016; 102(4): 414 - 421

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/tj.5000533

Authors

Carlo Corbellini, Roberto Biffi, Fabrizio Luca, Antonio Chiappa, Stefano Costa, Emilio Bertani, Stefano Bona, Davide Lombardi, Darina Tamayo, Edoardo Botteri, Bruno Andreoni

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: No financial support was received for this submission.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has conflict of interest with this submission.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  • Division of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy
  • General Surgery Residency, School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan - Italy
  • General and Emergency Surgery Department, IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan - Italy
  • Hepatobilary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy
  • General and Digestive Surgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Centre Rozzano, Milan - Italy
  • Division of General Surgery, Ospedale Girolamo Fracastoro, San Bonifacio, Verona - Italy
  • Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy
  • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy
  • Palliative Care Department, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.